Guest Dan Honemann Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:26 PM Report Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:26 PM More facts would be needed to be certain, but it would appear that the re-vote was not in order; however, it is too late to do anything about it now."
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:34 PM Report Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:34 PM >>A 3/4 vote was needed<< If your "3/4 vote" is anything like RONR's "two-thirds vote", you just need three-quarters of the votes cast, not three-quarters of all the members present. See also FAQ #6, elsew"
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:36 PM Report Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:36 PM K. Butler, >> A motion was immediately made and seconded to hold an immediate re-vote (essentially so that 43 votes could be achieved).<< kg: I doubt it fits, but nonetheless please read up on the motion RECONSIDER. It is all"
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 29, 2010 at 06:23 PM Report Posted March 29, 2010 at 06:23 PM If the first vote was taken by a counted, rising vote, it would, indeed, have been in order for a member to obtain the floor and move to take the vote by ballot. As you note, this motion requires a second, is undebatable, and requires a majority vote for "
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 29, 2010 at 06:34 PM Report Posted March 29, 2010 at 06:34 PM I think I hear zebras."
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.