Guest Dan Honemann Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:26 PM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:26 PM More facts would be needed to be certain, but it would appear that the re-vote was not in order; however, it is too late to do anything about it now." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:34 PM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:34 PM >>A 3/4 vote was needed<< If your "3/4 vote" is anything like RONR's "two-thirds vote", you just need three-quarters of the votes cast, not three-quarters of all the members present. See also FAQ #6, elsew" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:36 PM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:36 PM K. Butler, >> A motion was immediately made and seconded to hold an immediate re-vote (essentially so that 43 votes could be achieved).<< kg: I doubt it fits, but nonetheless please read up on the motion RECONSIDER. It is all" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 29, 2010 at 06:23 PM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 06:23 PM If the first vote was taken by a counted, rising vote, it would, indeed, have been in order for a member to obtain the floor and move to take the vote by ballot. As you note, this motion requires a second, is undebatable, and requires a majority vote for " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 29, 2010 at 06:34 PM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 06:34 PM I think I hear zebras." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.