Guest JDStackpole Posted April 6, 2010 at 04:05 PM Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 at 04:05 PM What sort of "attack" did you have in mind? By whom? With what WMDs?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 6, 2010 at 04:17 PM Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 at 04:17 PM It's not improper for a board to adopt a motion by unanimous consent (i.e. without objection). What matters is that the minutes record that the motion was adopted. That's the official record. On the other hand, "a course of action" soun" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted April 6, 2010 at 06:00 PM Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 at 06:00 PM james, What do you mean? Why would the board attack the very decision they just agreed to? They are free to AMEND it and RESCIND it. So it is always vulnerable to attack, in that regard. -kg " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted April 6, 2010 at 06:57 PM Report Share Posted April 6, 2010 at 06:57 PM In a small board, a decision can be reached on a proposal without a formal motion having been made, but care must be taken that all the members know exactly what is being agreed to. See RONR (10th ed.), p. 470, l. 33, through p. 471, l. 4." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 8, 2010 at 12:24 AM Report Share Posted April 8, 2010 at 12:24 AM >>if a formal resolution is not made but the board unanimously agrees to a course of action at a board meeting is the decision subject to attack<< During a board meeting, a board member may not comment adversely on a prior action not " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.