Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 12, 2010 at 09:03 PM Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 at 09:03 PM Your planning commission's rules supersede RONR so you should ask someone on the commission. Robert's Rules are just the "bare bones". Bones are important but that's not where the meat is." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 12, 2010 at 09:11 PM Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 at 09:11 PM All of this is really up to your commission. I'm not sure you're using the word "hearing" in the same way as RONR, but even if you are, RONR has very little to say about hearings." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted April 13, 2010 at 12:05 AM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 12:05 AM maricio, • "applicant" - no such thing in RONR. • "summary" or "closing statement" - no such thing in RONR. • "staff" - not allowed to talk under RONR. You " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 13, 2010 at 12:39 AM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 12:39 AM >>maricio<< Assuming Mr. Goldsworthy is not personally acquainted with Mr. ayala, he should avoid addressing him by his (misspelled) first name." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted April 13, 2010 at 02:03 AM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 02:03 AM HWM, Why? I wished all posters would specify the person whose post the poster is replying to. -kg " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gary c Tesser Posted April 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 11:30 AM Mmm. Remember "silly"?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mauricio ayala Posted April 13, 2010 at 03:23 PM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 03:23 PM Dear Mr. Goldsworthy, Your reply gave me the insight to determine that my question is unanswerable. The city planning commission holds meetings that are, due to bylaws, governed by RONR, however the by-laws go on to say that failure to conform does n" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mauricio ayala Posted April 13, 2010 at 03:36 PM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 03:36 PM After reading (and appreciating) all comment I am now able to refine my question...The city planning commission conducts meetings which, according to by-laws, are governed by RONR. However, the by-laws go on to say that any failure to conform does not in" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted April 13, 2010 at 04:33 PM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 04:33 PM M.A., >>Any suggestions?<< No. Not from me. No parliamentary rule is violated. Both parties, the affirmative (people who want something) and the negative (people who shoot down proposals) are being heard. It is 100% &" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest mauricio ayala Posted April 13, 2010 at 05:23 PM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 05:23 PM Appreciate your reply. Certainly I'm understanding of the real world and fully grasp that I've been snookered however, "staff" represents the opposition (and only opposition) and it is inherently unfair that the applicant not be allowed to spea" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted April 13, 2010 at 05:30 PM Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 at 05:30 PM (Snif, snif; sob, sob). :-)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 15, 2010 at 01:38 AM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 01:38 AM >>what I was hoping for from followers and scholars of parliamentary procedure is some outrage and perhaps some good buzz-words and/or rhetoric on better ways to insure the public's interest is given proper consideration and why (I can almost see th" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.