Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted April 14, 2010 at 05:38 AM Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 at 05:38 AM Betty, >>[board] bypasses the committee, which had no opportunity for input or discussion with the general membership.<< . . . >>Can the results of the ballot be invalidated?<< kg: No. Of course not. T" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 14, 2010 at 09:35 AM Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 at 09:35 AM Though in this case it's not clear ("an organization has a committee) that this particular committee is an instrument of the board. If it's an instrument of the general membership, and the general membership instructed the board to check with the com" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Thomas Ralph Posted April 14, 2010 at 09:40 AM Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 at 09:40 AM It may also be worth checking whether the board is authorized in the bylaws to conduct absentee ballots." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Betty Posted April 14, 2010 at 11:49 AM Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 at 11:49 AM Just to clarify, the committee is elected by the general membership, not appointed by the board. They represent interests specific to a certain portion of the membership. (There are other, similar committees). Could the members of that committee " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 14, 2010 at 11:56 AM Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 at 11:56 AM >>Could the members of that committee demand that the vote be cancelled and held again after they have considered it and delivered their opinion to the general membership?<< No. But as members of the association they can ask " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gary c Tesser Posted April 15, 2010 at 02:50 AM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 02:50 AM I suspect that my esteemed colleagues have all gone astray. For one thing, they seem to have assumed that the original poster, Betty, is discussing an election; but it seems to me that she is dealing with votes on other "matters" (Betty's signi" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Betty Posted April 15, 2010 at 01:04 PM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 01:04 PM Thank you Gary. You are correct, it was a vote on a rule change that affected one particular sector of the organization, that which the committee represented, but all members got to vote on it. I will see if we can't find some relevant informatio" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Betty Posted April 15, 2010 at 01:57 PM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 01:57 PM I have a further question on Art.VIII .47 "votes that are null and void". If the balloting in this case violated the by-laws of the organization in some way, that would nullify the results would it not? Is a violation of the by" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Thomas Ralph Posted April 15, 2010 at 02:06 PM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 02:06 PM Yes, if the ballot violated the bylaws it would be null and void." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted April 15, 2010 at 04:08 PM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 04:08 PM > Yes, if the ballot violated the bylaws it would be null and void. < I think this may be an oversimplification. The p. 244(a) reference is to a motion adopted which conflicts with the bylaws - such a motion is null and void. An action take" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 15, 2010 at 04:57 PM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 04:57 PM I agree with Trina. I do not believe that the board failing to consult with the committee, even if that is required by the Bylaws, would cause a continuing breach. The board members could, however, be disciplined for violating the Bylaws." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Betty Posted April 15, 2010 at 06:32 PM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 06:32 PM In further researching the by-laws of the organization, I found in the language, that the committee "shall have the authority and responsibility for developing, amending and revising....". What they have authority over, is rules and regulations " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 15, 2010 at 06:38 PM Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 at 06:38 PM The proper interpretation of your bylaws requires reading them in their entirety, something that's beyond the scope and purpose of this forum. Excerpts and paraphrases, especially when revealed in excruciating installments, are insufficient, and," Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 16, 2010 at 07:25 PM Report Share Posted April 16, 2010 at 07:25 PM It is ultimately up to your organization to interpret its own Bylaws. See RONR, 10th ed., pgs. 570-573 for some Principles of Interpretation for Bylaws." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.