Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted May 12, 2010 at 05:50 PM Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 at 05:50 PM Sheila, Since you are dealing with customized wording, then it won't be possible to point to a page in RONR to "prove" that one interpretation is correct. Under RONR: • A blank ballot is still a ballot. • A " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted May 12, 2010 at 05:51 PM Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 at 05:51 PM No." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted May 12, 2010 at 08:27 PM Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 at 08:27 PM > 75% of those casting a ballot < Perhaps there is some ambiguity, in which case your organization will have to resolve it. However, I don't believe that a ballot marked 'abstain' is being 'cast' in any direction. 'Cast' doesn't mean the sa" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted May 12, 2010 at 08:44 PM Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 at 08:44 PM Trina, >>'Cast' doesn't mean the same thing as 'turn in'.<< kg: Yes, it does. When Caesar said, "Alea iacta est" (the die has now been cast"), he referred to a rolling of dice (in singular form). Caesar" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted May 12, 2010 at 09:09 PM Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 at 09:09 PM > Trina, >>'Cast' doesn't mean the same thing as 'turn in'.<< kg: Yes, it does. < So, Sheila, you see why the decision is up to your organization :-) I'm not sure yet, but I don't think I will be persuaded " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest J. J. Posted May 12, 2010 at 10:31 PM Report Share Posted May 12, 2010 at 10:31 PM If the bylaws actually say "75% of those casting a ballot," the member did chose to cast a ballot even if he wrote "abstain." I would say yes. I would add that this rule is specific to your bylaws and is not part of RONR." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sheila Posted May 13, 2010 at 03:08 PM Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 at 03:08 PM Thank you all for your input. It was originally written so that abstentions would not count as a no vote. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gary c Tesser Posted May 14, 2010 at 10:49 AM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 10:49 AM It apparently didn't do the trick. Even has Mr Goldsworthy arguing with himself, which is never a good idea, as well as arguing with Trina, which isn't, either. Kim, Caesar knew darn well he was voting. To cast die such that abstaining is possi" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted May 14, 2010 at 10:56 AM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 10:56 AM Gary, when I thumb through a dictionary looking up a word, I regularly come out of it with at least one other new word in my vocabulary as a result. Reading your replies is often the same experience. :)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:25 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:25 PM GcT, Don't confuse "voting" with "casting". E.g., When Jesus "cast out demons", was Jesus (a.) voting? (b.) tallying; (b.) marking? Nay, verify, I say unto you. He was "casting out" - " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:29 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:29 PM It sounds like your saying that in order to abstain during a ballot vote, the only way to do so is to keep your ballot and not return to the teller. Can't you just return a blank ballot (folded so secrecy of your vote is maintained) and have it still be " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:41 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:41 PM >>It sounds like your saying that in order to abstain during a ballot vote, the only way to do so is to keep your ballot and not return to the teller.<< I don't think that's what Mr. Goldsworthy is saying at all. I think he's saying t" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:44 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:44 PM My apologies Mr G, and my thanks Mr H. I read what I wanted to read - "75% of those casting a vote" and glossed right over "ballot." (insert sheepish grin smiley here)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mr. J! Posted May 14, 2010 at 09:18 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 09:18 PM What if a voter turns in a ballot, carefully folded, with the words "Ce n'est pas un vote"?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sheila Posted May 14, 2010 at 10:38 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 10:38 PM So, would it have been better to word it "75% of the votes submitted"?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 14, 2010 at 10:55 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 10:55 PM The best language would probably be "a three-fourths vote"." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted May 15, 2010 at 05:44 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 at 05:44 PM But yes, Sheila, that would have been better, and thanks for distracting me, as I was about to argue theological procedure with Kim again." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted May 15, 2010 at 07:06 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 at 07:06 PM Jesus and Peter were perhaps 'casting', yet not 'casting ballots'. If one looks at the origins of 'ballot', namely the black and white balls dropped into a box, in that context it was impossible to cast an abstaining ballot. Each ballot dropped (" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.