Guest Chris H Posted May 13, 2010 at 02:18 AM Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 at 02:18 AM He is wrong. If he insists ask him to show you some citation to support this claim." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted May 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM Report Share Posted May 13, 2010 at 10:51 AM > ...he stated that if the motion was objected to twice, it was dead and could not be discussed or voted on. < That's just silly on the face of it. Such a rule would give any single individual the ability to deny consideration of any motion" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PJE Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:50 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:50 PM A motion to postpone indefinitely takes a mover, a second, and a majority vote. RONR pg 121. That is the way to kill a motion. Suggest to the malcontent that he make a proper motion and point him to the rule." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted May 15, 2010 at 07:35 AM Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 at 07:35 AM Trina, maybe by "twice," he meant objections from two people. That would clear it up, eh?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted May 15, 2010 at 08:29 AM Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 at 08:29 AM That's just silly on the face of it. Such a rule would give any two individuals the ability to deny consideration of any motion they didn't like." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted May 15, 2010 at 08:50 AM Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 at 08:50 AM Perhaps I should have put that in quotes. :-)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.