Guest Chris H Posted May 14, 2010 at 12:50 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 12:50 PM Amend the bylaws to change the procedures. Until that is done you need to follow the bylaws." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:11 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:11 PM Helen, What kind of work-around are you looking for? • To not allow "any member" to be the source? • To rid the reason ("for alleged misconduct")? • To make the charges oral instead of "" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:17 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:17 PM It seems, in this instances, that the perceived problem is that it's the secretary against whom the charges would be filed and the secretary to whom the charges must be submitted." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:19 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:19 PM KG - as Helen's conundrum involves charges filed against the Secretary (see subject line), I think she's looking for a way to avoid (as per the bylaws) filing the charges WITH the Secretary. Although that person will find out soon enough I suspect." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted May 15, 2010 at 07:18 AM Report Share Posted May 15, 2010 at 07:18 AM File the charges with someone else, too. Or maybe go ahead and file them with the secretary, and if he does his job without missing a beat, then that might be evidence that he takes his job seriously and does it conscientiously." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.