Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:57 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 05:57 PM It's hard to know where to begin. >>The By-Laws state that there can only be one candidate for President<< Surely this can't be true. If it is, why have an election at all? >>I asked the nomination committee to" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted May 14, 2010 at 07:45 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 07:45 PM I think I'm interpreting what you've said somewhat differently than Mr. Mountcastle - hence my comments will be different. I assume that the nominating committee nominated two people to serve together in the office of president (co-presidents), d" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FrankM Posted May 14, 2010 at 07:57 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 07:57 PM Obviously I haven't explained myself well enough. I probably did too little but I was trying to stay as removed from the process as possible since one of the candidates is related to me. I want to remain impartial. Answering your specifi" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FrankM Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:00 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:00 PM I think you did interpret it correctly and what you said makes a lot of sense. I have to look into this more this weekend and act quickly. We had the election the other night but the new officers don't take office until the first of next month. I" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:20 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:20 PM >>I wish I wasn't related to a candidate it would have made it much easier.<< That's beside the point. You should have fulfilled your responsibilities as president. You seem like a reasonable person. Don't you think you could have bee" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FrankM Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:36 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:36 PM >>That's beside the point.<< Your right about that. >>Don't you think you could have been fair and impartial?<< I believe I can be impartial, I'm concerned about how it looks and if other people will see " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:42 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:42 PM >>What the By-Laws say is what the By-Laws say and what is the right thing to do is the right thing to do<< Amen, brother! Now put this ship back on course and steer it to a safe harbor." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mr. J! Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:46 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:46 PM You are right. So, at the next meeting, someone should make a point of order that the election of co-presidents violates the bylaws. You should rule the point of order well taken. Someone may appeal from the decision of the chair, so be prepared to defend" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bruce Lages Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:57 PM Report Share Posted May 14, 2010 at 08:57 PM And, Frank, to be perfectly clear about your responsibilities as president - you preside over meetings, including meetings in which elections are held. Being related to a nominee, or even if you are a nominee, doesn't change that responsibility. If you " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.