Guest Rob Elsman Posted May 17, 2010 at 05:36 PM Report Share Posted May 17, 2010 at 05:36 PM Take a look at RONR (10th ed.), pp. 243, 244, about the timeliness of Points of Order. Without more facts, we cannot apply these rules to your particular situation." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jack Posted May 17, 2010 at 05:59 PM Report Share Posted May 17, 2010 at 05:59 PM the motion in question was incorrectly voted as needing a two thirds majority to pass. it did not get that amount of votes and was deemed defeated. a subsequent vote was taked on the same subject and passed with a large majority. it was called to the pres" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 17, 2010 at 06:29 PM Report Share Posted May 17, 2010 at 06:29 PM Errors such as those must be challenged when they are made. It's too late now. Most points of order must be made in a timely manner (i.e. when the infraction occurs) but some are so serious that they constitute a "continuing breach" of " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted May 17, 2010 at 06:34 PM Report Share Posted May 17, 2010 at 06:34 PM As far as I can tell from the facts provided, the actions taken do not fall within any of the five exceptions that would allow a Point of Order to be admitted now. If he admits one in error, any two members can raise an Appeal." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.