Guest Chris H Posted May 19, 2010 at 10:59 AM Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 at 10:59 AM "could a member rightfully argue (based on the language on the bottom of p. 336 that 'the only action that can legally be taken in the absence of a quorum is...etc.') that the action of opening the window was NOT an action the inquorate meeting was a" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted May 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM I suspect that p. 336 lines 33 ff. ("The only action...") refers to substantive actions but does not exclude related parliamentary procedural actions. There might be an analogy with the evolution, over the editions of RONR, of the rul" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted May 19, 2010 at 12:27 PM Report Share Posted May 19, 2010 at 12:27 PM Yikes, sorry about length of the original post. I hope there will be a 'preview' capability when the forum moves to its new format. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.