J. J. Posted June 24, 2010 at 01:56 PM Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 at 01:56 PM So, after dithering, I think the point of order in J.J.'s example should be ruled not well taken -- ruling it well taken would attempt to take the decision out of the assembly's hands, where it seems to properly belong. If people feel Joe's misconduct 10 years ago in another organization shouldn't count against him today, they should vote against the motion to rescind his election.I would rule the point of order not well taken, but I would permit an appeal. Largely, if the majority feels that it is not relevant, they may decide not to hear it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted June 24, 2010 at 02:29 PM Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 at 02:29 PM I just wanted to thank every who responded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Goldsworthy Posted June 24, 2010 at 07:29 PM Report Share Posted June 24, 2010 at 07:29 PM I just wanted to thank every who responded."And I would like to thank J.J. for posing the question."- Alphonse and Gastson (circa 1906) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.