Robert B Fish Posted July 18, 2010 at 04:57 PM Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 at 04:57 PM In an organization that has adopted "Robert's Rules of Order" as its parlipro, without specifying the "current edition" or any particular edition or even calling out Newly Revised, is there a rule that says that vague reference should mean the 10th ed.?-Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted July 18, 2010 at 05:00 PM Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 at 05:00 PM In an organization that has adopted "Robert's Rules of Order" as its parlipro, without specifying the "current edition" or any particular edition or even calling out Newly Revised, is there a rule that says that vague reference should mean the 10th ed.?-BobThe tenth edition say it would (opposite title page). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert B Fish Posted July 18, 2010 at 05:11 PM Author Report Share Posted July 18, 2010 at 05:11 PM The tenth edition say it would (opposite title page).Thanks, J.J. That note doesn't come up in the Electronic Edition. -Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.