Guest John Posted July 27, 2010 at 09:21 PM Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 at 09:21 PM I was recently appointed to a non profit civic organization board. Their website lists me as a member-at-large. All other members of the board with exception of officers are listed as members-at-large. What is the reasoning behind naming a member "at-large" as opposed to a board member? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted July 27, 2010 at 09:37 PM Report Share Posted July 27, 2010 at 09:37 PM I was recently appointed to a non profit civic organization board. Their website lists me as a member-at-large. All other members of the board with exception of officers are listed as members-at-large. What is the reasoning behind naming a member "at-large" as opposed to a board member?You'll have to figure out what it means for your particular organization. Generally, an "at large" position is one which doesn't represent a particular constituency. For example, you might have four board members representing the north, south, east, and west sections of a community and then have a couple of "at large" members selected by the entire community.In your case it may be that "at large" refers to those board members who are not also officers (e.g. president, secretary, etc.) but that's an improper use of the term. In the end, you're all board members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Goldsworthy Posted July 28, 2010 at 12:28 AM Report Share Posted July 28, 2010 at 12:28 AM What is the reasoning behind naming a member "at-large" as opposed to a board member?Unknown.The phrase "at large" is not found in RONR (10th ed. 2000).Ask the organization what they meant. - They drafted it, and they adopted it. Let's hope there was a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.