Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Tabled motions


Guest Noreen

Recommended Posts

It is correct that the motion dies. However, your question suggests an incorrect understanding of the motion "to table." See FAQ#12.

-Bob

It was the initial intent to "table" the motion. However, now it appears that it would have been more prudent to postpone the motion indefinitely. That was not evident until recently. Now we would like to propose something that will clear up the matter which is related, but not exactly the same. It will make the meeting less sloppy if we can simply "ignore" the tabled motion and let it die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was the initial intent to "table" the motion. However, now it appears that it would have been more prudent to postpone the motion indefinitely. That was not evident until recently. Now we would like to propose something that will clear up the matter which is related, but not exactly the same. It will make the meeting less sloppy if we can simply "ignore" the tabled motion and let it die.

"In cases in which the next regular business session will be held before a quarterly time interval has elapsed, a question laid on the table remains there until taken from the table or until the close of the next regular session; if not taken up by that time, the question dies. In cases in which the lapse of time between regular business sessions is greater than a quarterly time interval, a question laid on the table can remain there only until the end of the current session; and unless taken from the table earlier, the matter dies with the close of that session." [p206]

-Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...