Guest Cheryl Posted September 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM What are the implications of stating members' names in the Minutes. i.e. "Mr. Nother stated that, whilst he was in agreement with the proposal, he felt that more work was required before an informed decision could be made""Ms. Person disagreed with this, stating that the committee did not want to delay the processes"I have looked in the King Report on Corporate governance for South Africa - 2002 but can find nothing that covers this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted September 7, 2010 at 12:51 PM Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 at 12:51 PM As far as Robert's Rules are concerned discussion is not entered into the minutes at all, so it's a moot point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted September 7, 2010 at 03:27 PM Report Share Posted September 7, 2010 at 03:27 PM I have looked in the King Report on Corporate governance for South Africa - 2002 but can find nothing that covers this.Oddly enough, neither can I.Of course the names of members who make ("important") motions are recorded in the minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.