Guest Robert W. Barnes Posted September 10, 2010 at 02:16 AM Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 at 02:16 AM Just a general question. When Roberts is adopted by a deliberative body as the guide for discussion, debate and voting, is there included in Roberts a provision for censure of a member of the body who has made inappropriate remarks directed to others in the same body? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Elsman Posted September 10, 2010 at 02:22 AM Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 at 02:22 AM Just a general question. When Roberts is adopted by a deliberative body as the guide for discussion, debate and voting, is there included in Roberts a provision for censure of a member of the body who has made inappropriate remarks directed to others in the same body?When a member breaches the rules of decorum in debate, any member can raise a Point of Order by interrupting, saying, for example, "Mr. President, I call the gentleman to order!". Ordinarily, the chair should correct the fault by admonishing the speaker to avoid dealing in personalities and permit the speaker to continue, if no one objects. See RONR (10th ed.), §23, pp. 240ff. For more serious offenses, see pp. 626-628. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted September 10, 2010 at 02:41 AM Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 at 02:41 AM When a member breaches the rules of decorum in debate, any member can raise a Point of Order by interrupting, saying, for example, "Mr. President, I call the gentleman to order!". Ordinarily, the chair should correct the fault by admonishing the speaker to avoid dealing in personalities and permit the speaker to continue, if no one objects. See RONR (10th ed.), §23, pp. 240ff. For more serious offenses, see pp. 626-628.That applies only within the context of a meeting; I'm not sure if these comments were made within a meeting. Mr. Barnes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted September 10, 2010 at 08:32 AM Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 at 08:32 AM Just a general question. When Roberts is adopted by a deliberative body as the guide for discussion, debate and voting, is there included in Roberts a provision for censure of a member of the body who has made inappropriate remarks directed to others in the same body?The motion to censure is simply an original main motion which expresses the assembly's disapproval. It is debatable and requires a majority vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted September 10, 2010 at 10:15 AM Report Share Posted September 10, 2010 at 10:15 AM Just a general question. When Roberts is adopted by a deliberative body as the guide for discussion, debate and voting, is there included in Roberts a provision for censure of a member of the body who has made inappropriate remarks directed to others in the same body?RONR devotes an entire chapter (the dreaded "Dos Equis" Chapter XX) to Disciplinary Procedures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trina Posted September 11, 2010 at 12:29 PM Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 at 12:29 PM RONR devotes an entire chapter (the dreaded "Dos Equis" Chapter XX) to Disciplinary Procedures.I still haven't gotten around to reading that one from beginning to end, so 'dreaded' seems to apply. Maybe I need a bottle of the matching beverage, while reading, as suggested by Mr. Mountcastle's reference . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted September 11, 2010 at 10:34 PM Report Share Posted September 11, 2010 at 10:34 PM I still haven't gotten around to reading that one from beginning to end, so 'dreaded' seems to apply. Maybe I need a bottle of the matching beverage, while reading, as suggested by Mr. Mountcastle's reference .A bottle? Trina, I'd put a six-pack in the fridge, just to be sure. It's a feature-packed 20 pages, to be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Robert W. Barnes Posted September 12, 2010 at 12:18 AM Report Share Posted September 12, 2010 at 12:18 AM That applies only within the context of a meeting; I'm not sure if these comments were made within a meeting. Mr. Barnes?Yes. Totally within the context of a measure being debated on the floor of the meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted September 12, 2010 at 04:18 AM Report Share Posted September 12, 2010 at 04:18 AM Yes. Totally within the context of a measure being debated on the floor of the meeting.In that case, the chair might "name" the offender (pp. 627-8). Basically censure is a motion that expresses the opinion of the assembly. Naming a member is the first step in disciplinary action in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Elsman Posted September 12, 2010 at 06:36 PM Report Share Posted September 12, 2010 at 06:36 PM Yes. Totally within the context of a measure being debated on the floor of the meeting.If the offense is the first, and not exceptionally grievous, a simple admonition by the chair should suffice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.