Gary Novosielski Posted September 28, 2010 at 02:41 AM Report Share Posted September 28, 2010 at 02:41 AM Yes it is a rule of order.... which fails to create a continuing breach beyond adjournment.(As long as the meeting itself is ongoing, a point of order may be raised regarding the infraction. After adjournment, it will be too late.)I don't dispute that. I agree that no continuing breach would be created. I'd be perfectly satisfied to know that a timely point of order raised against the conduct of business while there were not both a president and a secretary on duty would be well taken. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted September 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM Report Share Posted September 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM I agree that no continuing breach would be created. This, at least, evidences an understanding that the sentence on page 21, lines 5-10, does not mean that, if one person serves as both presiding officer and secretary, it is not possible for business to be conducted. It is also a big step in the right direction toward an understanding that it is not even a violation of any rule in RONR, but we can leave this understanding for another day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.