markcolomb Posted November 21, 2010 at 01:07 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 01:07 PM Can anyone help me with this issue? If ballots have been given to members and voting has begun, can the body vote to stop the process?
jstackpo Posted November 21, 2010 at 01:30 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 01:30 PM No. No interruptions allowed during voting - p. 408.Unhappy with the ongoing voting process? Raise your point of order immediately after voting is completed - p. 244.
Gary Novosielski Posted November 21, 2010 at 03:22 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 03:22 PM Can anyone help me with this issue? If ballots have been given to members and voting has begun, can the body vote to stop the process?No. Period.
Kim Goldsworthy Posted November 21, 2010 at 06:39 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 06:39 PM If ballots have been given to members and voting has begun, can the body vote to stop the process?For what purpose is the stoppage?E.g., if _____:• the meeting hall is on fire, • an armed man wearing a ski mask is shooting the sergeant-at-arms,• the police S.W.A.T. squad had busted in the front door,• a drunken driver has plowed into the west wall of the meeting room,... then the default rule in Robert's Rules of Order may not apply.Else? No.A point of order might be possible, though, despite page 408's rule.(excerpt, p. 408)INTERRUPTION OF VOTES. Interruptions dur-ing the taking of a vote are permitted only before any mem-ber has actually voted, unless, as sometimes occurs in ballotvoting, other business is being transacted during voting ortabulating. For points of order regarding the conduct of avote, see pp. 243-44.
Tim Wynn Posted November 21, 2010 at 06:50 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 06:50 PM For what purpose is the stoppage?E.g., if _____:... an armed man wearing a ski mask is shooting the sergeant-at-arms...As opposed to an unarmed man shooting the sergeant-at-arms?
Kim Goldsworthy Posted November 21, 2010 at 06:59 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 06:59 PM As opposed to an unarmed man shooting the sergeant-at-arms?Uh --- Well ---Maybe I should have specified the arms being brandished. I mean, you cannot shoot the sergeant at arms with a Japanese samurai sword. The ski mask on the Samurai might have been a hair bit anachronistic, though.I don't think Samurai do much skiiing nowadays, so they?
hmtcastle Posted November 21, 2010 at 06:59 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 06:59 PM As opposed to an unarmed man shooting the sergeant-at-arms?Or a one-armed man leaving the scene of the crime.
Tim Wynn Posted November 21, 2010 at 07:18 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 07:18 PM I mean, you cannot shoot the sergeant at arms with a Japanese samurai sword. Here we go again: as opposed to a non-Japanese samurai sword?
Tim Wynn Posted November 21, 2010 at 07:20 PM Report Posted November 21, 2010 at 07:20 PM Or a one-armed man leaving the scene of the crime.... commonly mistaken for Dr. Richard Kimble.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.