Guest concern Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:29 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:29 PM Is it acceptable for a Board member to be employed by that Board to work for the Association and profitand also that Board members family working for the same Board Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:44 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:44 PM Is it acceptable for a Board member to be employed by that Board to work for the Association and profitand also that Board members family working for the same BoardThere's no rule against it in RONR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:46 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:46 PM Is it acceptable for a Board member to be employed by that Board to work for the Association and profitand also that Board members family working for the same BoardNo rule in RONR prohibits it. Your rules may vary.The best way to keep family members from serving on the board is to elect someone else.The term "conflict of interest" does not appear in RONR (though RONR does suggest that a member not vote on a question in which he has a direct personal or pecuniary interest not common to other members). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:48 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:48 PM There's no rule against it in RONR.But maybe this particular organization has a custom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:50 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 03:50 PM But maybe this particular organization has a custom?A custom what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 7, 2010 at 05:04 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 05:04 PM Is it acceptable for a Board member to be employed by that Board to work for the Association and profitand also that Board members family working for the same BoardIf you don;t want this to be allowed, then you might consider placing restrictions in the bylaws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted December 7, 2010 at 05:40 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 05:40 PM If you don;t want this to be allowed, then you might consider placing restrictions in the bylaws.Or don't...the chances of the language being clear, concise and encompassing all at the same time - less than zero. (oh, can't you be slightly more creative in your name? ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted December 7, 2010 at 06:41 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 06:41 PM can't you be slightly more creative in your name?[rant]The problem is that if you don't enter anything in the "Name" field, the system gives you the name of "Guest". I would hope the Administrators would [a] make this a required field and prohibit "Guest" and "guest" as options. There is a frequent responder on this forum who is identified as "Guest" and, at first, I thought he was entering "Guest" as his name, but now I think he's simply not taking the time to enter anything at all.[/rant] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted December 7, 2010 at 10:01 PM Report Share Posted December 7, 2010 at 10:01 PM Or don't...the chances of the language being clear, concise and encompassing all at the same time - less than zero. It doesn't seem that complicated to make a provision prohibiting employees of the association from serving on the board, and such provisions are fairly common.I agree that a provision regarding "family members" would be much more difficult to define. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted December 8, 2010 at 12:43 AM Report Share Posted December 8, 2010 at 12:43 AM It doesn't seem that complicated to make a provision prohibiting employees of the association from serving on the board, and such provisions are fairly common.I agree that a provision regarding "family members" would be much more difficult to define.Josh, if you were writing it for them I wouldn't have posted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted December 8, 2010 at 02:08 AM Report Share Posted December 8, 2010 at 02:08 AM A custom what?A custom, a usage or practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted December 8, 2010 at 07:34 AM Report Share Posted December 8, 2010 at 07:34 AM A custom, a usage or practice.Yes? And do they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.