Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

motions


Guest Margaret Fae

Recommended Posts

It is my understanding that the fact that a motion has been made and seconded does not put it before the assembly for voting unless the chair alone can does that. Are there any provisions or instances where the Chair must recognize and follow through on a motion and second for voting, particularly when the majority of the assembly wants to address a particular item of business?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that the fact that a motion has been made and seconded does not put it before the assembly for voting unless the chair alone can does that. Are there any provisions or instances where the Chair must recognize and follow through on a motion and second for voting, particularly when the majority of the assembly wants to address a particular item of business?

The chair is compelled to state the motion to the assembly after someone gained the floor, made a motion and it was seconded.

If he does not then you should raise a point or order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the chair is not really free to "block" consideration of a proper motion.

However, if, in his judgement, the motion is not "proper" - for good reason(s) - he should rule that it is out of order. In the absence of an appeal of the ruling of the chair, that will keep the motion from going forward.

But... if a majority still thinks it is proper to consider the motion, they, the majority, will after the appeal has been made, "not sustain the ruling of the chair" and the consideration will proceed.

The chairman can NOT block thing on his own -- only if the majority agrees, subsequently, that the chair was right in his ruling will the motion be stopped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is my understanding that the fact that a motion has been made and seconded does not put it before the assembly for voting unless the chair alone can does that.

It IS before the assembly at that point and what they do with it is up to them. The chair SERVES the assembly and facilitates the process; he does not rule like a dictator. When it's before the assembly (and the chair should state this as noted above) the assembly may take actions prior to voting (e.g. object to consideration, amending, referring, etc) as appropriate, but in most simple cases, there would be discussion and a vote.

Maybe you're referring to the chair "putting the question" to the assembly for a vote? (which simply refers to the chair announcing that debate is over and we're commencing the voting.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It IS before the assembly at that point and what they do with it is up to them. The chair SERVES the assembly and facilitates the process; he does not rule like a dictator. When it's before the assembly (and the chair should state this as noted above) the assembly may take actions prior to voting (e.g. object to consideration, amending, referring, etc) as appropriate, but in most simple cases, there would be discussion and a vote.

Maybe you're referring to the chair "putting the question" to the assembly for a vote? (which simply refers to the chair announcing that debate is over and we're commencing the voting.)

My guess is that Beverly has this sentence from page 31 in mind: "Neither the making nor the seconding of a motion places it before the assembly; only the chair can do that, by the third step (stating the question)."

But as has been previously noted, the chair is obliged to state the question on the motion if the wording is clear and it is in order at the time. As you point out, "he does not rule like a dictator." smile.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...