Bret Holbert

16 hours ago, Josh Martin said:

The board will need to wait until the 21st for the vote, unless all board members are present, in which event the board (not one member) could choose to vote tonight.

The meeting occurred last night, and after much pushback during the public forum, the board moved to table the agenda item until the later date.

Thank you for your help.

He did not notify all board members prior to setting the agenda for the June 8 meeting to "discuss and possibly vote" on the applicants for the vacancy, which was in conflict with the wording of the original motion approved by the board to discuss on the 8th, and vote on the 21st.

The motion was to discuss vacancy applicants on June 8 then vote on June 21.  Now, the member who creates the agenda has included in said agenda language to discuss and possibly vote to fill the vacancy on June 8, despite the wording of the approved motion in the previous meeting.