cranneberry
-
Posts
2 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by cranneberry
-
-
In an HOA membership meeting in 2016 a motion was made for a 5 person board and another motion was made for terms for a 5 person board, one 3 year term, two 2 year terms and two 1 year terms. At the meeting in 2017, 2 seats were up for reelection, yet both people were given 3 years terms. When I questioned the HOA manager about the terms and suggested a legal opinion be sought, she stated a legal opinion was given in the 2016 meeting that going forward each person elected would receive a 3 year term. There is nothing in the minutes about a legal opinion being given nor is there anything in the minutes referring to any subsequent elections. There is mention of a legal opinion for other matters. Would I be correct in stating that if there was no mention of the legal opinion in the minutes, then it basically didn't happen?
Not in the miuntes, did it really happen
in General Discussion
Posted
There was no amendment to the bylaws only a motion. My contention is that by allowing the 2017 board members to both have a 3 year term, it is going against the motion made in 2016. When I questioned the manager, the response I got was that there had been a legal opinion offered. As that legal opinion was not in the minutes, (which I understand shouldn't have been) yet other legal opinions were, shouldn't the minutes then have included all of them? I was at the meeting in question and do not recall an opinion being given on the terms. Or am I off base on this?