Greetings. This question involves the nomination and subsequent election of the president of a volunteer organization. The organization follows RONR for parliamentary procedures. In this case, there was an annual election of officers. The Bylaws of the organization provide that nominations for these positions may only be made by "delegates." (I am not a member of this organization so not really sure what the function of a "delegate" is, however their Bylaws are clear as to that is who may make a nomination.) A nomination for the position of president was made from the floor by a person who was not a "delegate." Apparently no one noticed the error and the nomination was accepted. That individual was elected. No objection to the fact the nomination was not made by a "delegate" was made at the time of the nomination and election. Now (3 months later) a question is asked as to whether the election should be voided due to the flawed nomination. The organization's Bylaws are silent on this. My understanding of RONR (admittedly not as extensive as you-alls!) is that except for limited circumstance, objections to an election must be made at the time of the election. The exceptions being: elected individual does not meet the qualifications for election; there already was a valid election for the current term; votes of non-members or absentees affected the result of the election; proper notice of the election was not given; and disenfranchisement of members would change the result. I am not sure a flawed nomination would fit into any of these categories. Your perspectives appreciated. Thank you in advance.