Hello! I’m brand new to parliamentary procedure, so I apologize in advance for any misconceptions I may have.
I have a question in regards to the grounds for the use of an executive session. The setting is a public school board meeting in Texas. The board has attracted the ire of many parents in its jurisdiction, and they have noticed that the board goes into executive session quite often when conducting day-to-day administration. The perception is that executive session is being used inappropriately.
I have two questions:
1) What are established grounds for the use of exective session?
2) What means would the public have at its disposal to dispute the frequent use of exective session?
Thank you in advance for your input.
