Our by-laws also state "Elections of Directors and Officers shall be by written ballot."
It is my understanding that a bylaw stating this can not be set aside (we have not provisions in our by-laws that specifically speak of setting aside any of our by-laws). In my opinion, what the secretary has done by asking that everything be kept as status quo, is to have "jumped over' the election process, essentially "setting aside" the voting by ballot process altogether, as well as our nomination process. Not to mention the fact that this will also affect next year's board members who term would have been expired. We would again have the issue of extending half of our board member's term of office.
As you mentioned above, I also mentioned setting the date of the election within 60 days of what would have been the end of our fair but the secretary would not consider it. I feel as if we are Congress, voting ourselves another year to our term, totally ignoring those that elect us.
Am I wrong?