Jim Healer

Actually, Richard, because of their power to levy fines and enforce restrictions on real property and property owners, it does make them required to follow 14th Amendment Due Process clause. That is the real crux of the issue here. I'm trying to find out where the line between fairness and arbitrary/capricious is. I'm just looking for something that i maybe can use because there is an absence of authority.

They carry the force of law to enforce real-estate covenants, levy fines, the power of foreclosure, etc...

In particular I am dealing with a Homeowners Association in Texas. State Law gives the attachment of the NGO/Quasi-governmental authority to the land, and allows the organization to produce its own articles of incorporation, bylaws and restrictive covenants for the property. My biggest challenge is the lack of process to hold an out-of-control organization accountable for blatant disregard for property owners in its overreach of authority.

Hi everyone, Has anyone dealt with what happens when a quasi-governmental organization fails to follow common parliamentary procedure in its dealings, has no reference to parliamentary procedure in its articles of incorporation, bylaws, or declarations, and then governing state law does not require a parliamentary procedure to be adopted? How do we resolve a conflict? Thanks in advance for your feedback.