The problem is a letter was sent to an individual member of the organization, sharing allegation's against a good name and member of the board.
That letter was not shared with the board, but was read to the entire membership.
There are no charges being brought, at this time that we are aware.
The question come, if allegation's were shared to the entire membership, and not to the board initially, we have no by laws that address outside correspondence to be required to be brought to the board initially.
Since we have no by law for this, and there is no details regarding the handling of correspondence, we are looking to RONR to guide us.
I went back to read Sec. 63, and they all seem to deal with when charges are made, but this case has no charges, just a letter to share information that shows a good name and member of the board in a negative light, to all members and non members.
What I seem to read there are no RONR that would address expected path that correspondence should fallow, and since there are no charges at this time, there is nothing the board can do. Knowing a public shaming with inaccuracy information was shared about a good name member of the board. Just making sure we are not missing a process that should be taken.