Are their requirements for a main motion to be considered valid, even if seconded, debated, and passed?
i.e. if a main motion is passed, but hindsight realizes that it's wording would technically allow action for perpetuity (no date or action), or doesn't assign a specific requirement for signature but rather a vague sub-category of action is that grounds for invalidation or re-consideration at the next meeting?
If yes, how would that be approached, as clearly to reconsider the majority passing side would not want to reconsider at all.
