Guest Bob Battani Posted April 11, 2011 at 01:23 PM Report Share Posted April 11, 2011 at 01:23 PM We hold Quarterly face to face meetings but want to hold monthly teleconference meetings as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted April 11, 2011 at 01:32 PM Report Share Posted April 11, 2011 at 01:32 PM We hold Quarterly face to face meetings but want to hold monthly teleconference meetings as wellOnly if the bylaws authorize this, and they must clearly spell out all the procedures required to make the meeting legitimate, and there is a lot to consider in that one word. See RONR (10th Ed.) pages 482-483 for some insights into this, as well as pages 1-643 for more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:02 AM Report Share Posted April 14, 2011 at 12:02 AM Only if the bylaws authorize this, and they must clearly spell out all the procedures required to make the meeting legitimate, and there is a lot to consider in that one word. See RONR (10th Ed.) pages 482-483 for some insights into this, as well as pages 1-643 for more.Well, not quite. It is entirely appropriate to have a general authorization in the Bylaws and leave the details to lower-level rules, such as special rules of order and standing rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted April 14, 2011 at 01:31 AM Report Share Posted April 14, 2011 at 01:31 AM Well, not quite. It is entirely appropriate to have a general authorization in the Bylaws and leave the details to lower-level rules, such as special rules of order and standing rules.I sit corrected. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.