Guest Colby Posted April 19, 2011 at 07:45 PM Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 at 07:45 PM during our meeting last week, our president was brought up for impeachment. the protocol for this is provided in our bylaws as simply requiring a 3/4 vote when brought up at at any regular meeeting with an active quorum. I don't know if the 3/4 would have been met but it didn't go much beyond the motion and second as the president declined to entertain the motion. can the president decline a motion for his own impeachment? isn't there a conflict of interest that would demand that some one else take over at that point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert B Fish Posted April 19, 2011 at 08:38 PM Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 at 08:38 PM The president does not have the power to deny a motion on his authority alone unless your bylaws say that he does. If he ruled the motion out of order, he must state the reason for his ruling. You may appeal the ruling to the assembly and they can overrule his ruling with a majority vote.If he is just trying to stonewall you, make a motion to suspend the rules and have someone else preside, such a the vice-president or an outside neutral person. A 2/3 vote is required for this.-Bob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Colby Posted April 19, 2011 at 11:30 PM Report Share Posted April 19, 2011 at 11:30 PM could you point me to any documentation on what it means to declare a motion out of order? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted April 20, 2011 at 03:10 AM Report Share Posted April 20, 2011 at 03:10 AM could you point me to any documentation on what it means to declare a motion out of order?RONR, 10th ed., pgs. 240-252The short version is that the chair would be ruling that the motion violates some rule in the parliamentary authority or your assembly's customized rules. Alternately, it may be that the motion itself is in order but it is not in order at that particular time. The chair should state his reason for ruling the motion out of order, and his ruling is subject to appeal.The President can't "deny" or rule a motion out of order simply because he doesn't like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.