Guest BillDana Posted July 12, 2011 at 09:08 PM Report Share Posted July 12, 2011 at 09:08 PM here is a "law" intended for a trust. We have not voted on the other "law's" or the rest of the trust yet due to the first meeting has not yet been decided!9. An outside party (Accountant) shall be put in charge of the trust. With the members of the trust having voting power. One senior vote will equal 100 votes, senior being over or at the age of 60. Every other member (over 35) vote will be worth 1 vote. No member under the age of 35 will have a vote unless there are no members above the age of 35. The trust shall never be dissolved, nor run in deficit.Is this voting style right? or is this just a way for the creater to keep control of the trust why they are alive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BillDana Posted July 12, 2011 at 09:31 PM Report Share Posted July 12, 2011 at 09:31 PM here is a "law" intended for a trust. We have not voted on the other "law's" or the rest of the trust yet due to the first meeting has not yet been decided!9. An outside party (Accountant) shall be put in charge of the trust. With the members of the trust having voting power. One senior vote will equal 100 votes, senior being over or at the age of 60. Every other member (over 35) vote will be worth 1 vote. No member under the age of 35 will have a vote unless there are no members above the age of 35. The trust shall never be dissolved, nor run in deficit.Is this voting style right? or is this just a way for the creater to keep control of the trust why they are alive?This is in reference of the 100 votes per person for the person or people over the age of 60 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted July 12, 2011 at 09:41 PM Report Share Posted July 12, 2011 at 09:41 PM here is a "law" intended for a trust. We have not voted on the other "law's" or the rest of the trust yet due to the first meeting has not yet been decided!9. An outside party (Accountant) shall be put in charge of the trust. With the members of the trust having voting power. One senior vote will equal 100 votes, senior being over or at the age of 60. Every other member (over 35) vote will be worth 1 vote. No member under the age of 35 will have a vote unless there are no members above the age of 35. The trust shall never be dissolved, nor run in deficit.Is this voting style right? or is this just a way for the creater to keep control of the trust why they are alive? As stated on its Introductory Page, “this Forum is provided to allow an open exchange of views relevant to specific questions of parliamentary procedure under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised”.This question is not one concerning what is or is not proper parliamentary procedure under the rules in RONR. As a consequence, we respectfully request that those interested in pursuing this question do so by private email, or other means outside of this forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.