wandajr Posted February 8, 2013 at 09:55 PM Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 at 09:55 PM Does the seconder of the motion need to agree that the motion was not written correctly before tha motion can be changed and the minutes of that previous meeting be adopted as read? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted February 8, 2013 at 10:00 PM Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 at 10:00 PM No, and not the maker of the motion either. The members at the meeting where the minutes are approved (not "adopted") decide what goes in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted February 8, 2013 at 10:29 PM Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 at 10:29 PM Does the seconder of the motion need to agree that the motion was not written correctly before tha motion can be changed and the minutes of that previous meeting be adopted as read?And just to be picky, if a correction is made to the minutes while they are up for approval, the chair should announce them as "approved (not adopted) as corrected." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted February 8, 2013 at 10:50 PM Report Share Posted February 8, 2013 at 10:50 PM Which is why we of the cognoscenti move to amend something previously approved if they need corrected at a subsequent meeting. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.