Atul Kapur Posted February 15, 2021 at 07:57 PM Report Posted February 15, 2021 at 07:57 PM The language on p. vii that begins, "This Twelfth Edition supersedes all previous editions and is intended automatically to become the parliamentary authority . . . " also appears (with the correct edition number) on p. vii of the 11th edition and p. II of the 10th. In which edition did this language first appear? Prior to that, was there another rule or was this (or similar) language felt to be simply an explicit statement of what was previously considered understood? Quote
Guest Zev Posted February 15, 2021 at 08:26 PM Report Posted February 15, 2021 at 08:26 PM General Robert never said any such thing as "supersedes" and I cannot find any such language to the effect that any edition "supersedes" anything before the 1970 edition. There was no "another rule" or anything similar. I have the text for all editions 1 through 6 in order to prove this. Quote
Dan Honemann Posted February 15, 2021 at 09:10 PM Report Posted February 15, 2021 at 09:10 PM 1 hour ago, Atul Kapur said: The language on p. vii that begins, "This Twelfth Edition supersedes all previous editions and is intended automatically to become the parliamentary authority . . . " also appears (with the correct edition number) on p. vii of the 11th edition and p. II of the 10th. In which edition did this language first appear? The 7th Edition (1970) 1 hour ago, Atul Kapur said: Prior to that, was there another rule or was this (or similar) language felt to be simply an explicit statement of what was previously considered understood? The latter, I would assume. Quote
Atul Kapur Posted February 15, 2021 at 10:39 PM Author Report Posted February 15, 2021 at 10:39 PM 1 hour ago, Daniel H. Honemann said: The 7th Edition (1970) The latter, I would assume. Thank you. Quote
Recommended Posts