Guest J. J. Posted March 18, 2010 at 01:23 AM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 01:23 AM Was the bylaw initially pending at the first meeting? Do the bylaws require thirty days notice? J. J." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 02:21 AM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 02:21 AM The bylaws do require 30 days notice...which is what the rev. comm. was complying with at the march meeting...giving the membership the written proposed amendments that were also orally explained & discussion of each was allowed from the floor at the " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest J. J. Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:06 AM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:06 AM It sounds like the committee did not give notice of the document at the March meeting. I think to be safe, notice should be given at the April meeting and they should be considered at the May meeting. J. J." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gary c Tesser Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:56 AM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:56 AM I think it would probably be safe for them at least to act on some of the non-controversial proposals without delaying another month, which might, mirabile dictu, actually get something accomplished. This depends on exactly what the bylaws provide for th" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 01:09 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 01:09 PM Original Message: The bylaws do require 30 days notice...which is what the rev. comm. was complying with at the march meeting...giving the membership the written proposed amendments that were also orally explained & discussion of each was allowed " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 01:12 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 01:12 PM Thank you for clarifying the 'amendment' 'revision' differences; that's helpful. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted March 18, 2010 at 11:28 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 11:28 PM >>So at the upcoming April meeting can the vote be taken w/ out further discussion on the proposed amendments?<< So long as none of the changes since March fall outside the scope of the notice, and so long as the April meeting is at l" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 18, 2010 at 11:32 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 11:32 PM >>if this is a revision, as Mr. Tesser suggested may be the case, you don't need to worry about scope<< What removes the "scope of the notice" restriction is notice of a revision. What the finished product looks like is imma" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gary c Tesser Posted March 19, 2010 at 01:49 AM Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 at 01:49 AM Actually, men, I very much doubt that distinguishing between amending and revising the bylaws is high on their list of problems. -- what with bouncing the proposals back and forth between the membership and the bylaws committee, and the board sticking its" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.