Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:18 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:18 PM Lay on the Table is the wrong motion to use to shut of debate. The motion you want is Previous Question. In its simplest form, the motion might be, "Mr. President, I move the Previous Question." This motion requires a second, is neither debatabl" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:20 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:20 PM But Rob, the Original Poster says that "the question has been called." LAH, was the "Previous Question" legitimately moved? -- voted on?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:23 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:23 PM I suspect he means, "Are you ready for the question?"" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:26 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:26 PM And by "he" I suspect Mr. Elsman means LAH (or the chair) since, of course, "he" is gender-neutral. :)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:38 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:38 PM "shut of" should be "shut off", of course." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LAH Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:43 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:43 PM After there was a long debate on the floor on the motion, a member after being reconized by the chair called for the question. Then another member called to table the motion? The motion was tabled? Was this correct? " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:46 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 05:46 PM The motion "to table" was almost certainly out of order. See FAQ ##12 and 13 elsewhere on this website." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LAH Posted March 20, 2010 at 06:18 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 06:18 PM The question was not voted on" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 20, 2010 at 07:30 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 07:30 PM Lay on the table was proper if the timing was right - see p. 204 - and since the vote on the main motion was not (yet) taken, it was proper. It, the motion, can be taken from the table (by majority vote) next meeting - if the next meeting is wit" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 20, 2010 at 07:36 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 07:36 PM I think they're trying to kill the motion, not lay it aside." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LAH Posted March 20, 2010 at 07:41 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 07:41 PM I think they were trying to delay the vote. It appeared that the motion would not pass at that meeting." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 20, 2010 at 07:46 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 07:46 PM Lay on the Table is out of order when the purpose is to postpone the motion to the next meeting." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 20, 2010 at 08:19 PM Report Share Posted March 20, 2010 at 08:19 PM All of the above is quite possible - but I didn't attempt any mind-reading. I just assumed they were "tabling" properly (probably incorrectly). " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted March 21, 2010 at 09:44 PM Report Share Posted March 21, 2010 at 09:44 PM >>I think they were trying to delay the vote. It appeared that the motion would not pass at that meeting.<< Then the proper motion would have been Postpone to a Certain Time, but it's too late to raise a Point of Order about that now." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.