Guest Chris H Posted March 22, 2010 at 06:37 PM Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 at 06:37 PM The President should have directed the secretary to "take down objectionable or disorderly words used by the member". See RONR pp. 626-628 for how to deal with a disorderly member and p. 629 lines 5-11 if he refused to leave after being ejected" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dorene Posted March 22, 2010 at 06:42 PM Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 at 06:42 PM Is it too late to enter his words after the fact? He never was ejected from the meeting." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted March 22, 2010 at 07:09 PM Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 at 07:09 PM Yes." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted March 22, 2010 at 09:47 PM Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 at 09:47 PM Why? Why can't the assembly order the minutes corrected while they're pending approval or after the fact via a motion to amend something previously adopted? I realize there could be a practical problem.....but that's not my question." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:12 PM Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:12 PM If the presiding officer did not direct the secretary to take down the offending words used by the member at the time they were being uttered, as he should have done (p. 627, l. 7-10), it is too late for him to do so now. As far as the assembly c" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:40 PM Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:40 PM Offensive words aren't my idea of debate, that's why." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:43 PM Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:43 PM In fact they are part of the reason for a point of order and a ruling......so I think it's proper." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:56 PM Report Share Posted March 22, 2010 at 10:56 PM But George, there was no point of order and no ruling." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gary c Tesser Posted March 23, 2010 at 04:26 AM Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 at 04:26 AM But the chair would direct the secretary to take down the offensive words before any ruling, or point of order, or appeal." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted March 23, 2010 at 10:20 AM Report Share Posted March 23, 2010 at 10:20 AM >>But the chair would direct the secretary to take down the offensive words before any ruling, or point of order, or appeal.<< Yeah, but he didn't." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.