Voting descrepincy

[Guest Rob Elsman]

Based solely on the facts given, there is no next step. Apparently, three members who signed the first voter list decided not to vote before signing the second list. That's their right. So good, so fine. Move on."

[Guest Donnie]

I forgot to add on the first documented count, the candidate had lost the election by 2 votes. Then in the following recounts, the other guy won by 1. Then to have the voting logs off by 3 votes, it gives the appearance of possible fraud."

[Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle]

If ALL the ballots and ALL the supporting documents (e.g. logs) have been SECURELY preserved, go ahead and ask for a recount. If enough members agree with you, you can count the votes again. And again.

But it sounds like you'll keep getting a dif"

[Guest Rob Elsman]

No, it doesn't."

[Guest Donnie]

With the division in our union, and the exact number of votes needed to with and the log descrep. another vote seems almost needed. We do the checks n balances in the voting to prevent this very thing. I'm just trying to get opinions."

[Guest Rob Elsman]

The facts provided do not, in themselves, indicate that illegal voters cast illegal votes. In my opinion, the result of the vote announced by the presiding officer stands. "

[Guest Donnie]

Thanks"