Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 25, 2010 at 09:30 PM Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 at 09:30 PM Nope. But you might want to re-read and re-state your question." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest D Saperstein Posted March 25, 2010 at 09:48 PM Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 at 09:48 PM To clarify: The body is deeply divided over a particular provision of the rules (let's say it is that the CEO has authority to fire the treasurer). Those currently in the majority are fearful that following the next election, they will be in the minorit" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 25, 2010 at 09:57 PM Report Share Posted March 25, 2010 at 09:57 PM Well, with previous notice a majority vote can amend something previously adopted. But the rule change that's being proposed here sounds like something that is, or should be, in the bylaws and, as such, might require something more than a majorit" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kelso Posted March 26, 2010 at 06:05 AM Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 at 06:05 AM A good principle to uphold in RONR is that you need a 2/3 vote or higher to enact rules that limit future activity, such as with what you're proposing. If it's true that your organization has NOTHING in its bylaws or policies regarding how such t" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted March 26, 2010 at 10:12 AM Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 at 10:12 AM > Is this permitted under RRONR by a simple majority vote? < If your rules (bylaws?) specify that they can be amended by a majority vote, then you do indeed need to follow the amendment process as specified in those rules (i.e. majority vot" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ET Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:27 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:27 PM If our constitution is silent on this, do we follow the 2/3 rules? Is it 2/3 of registered paid members as opposed to 2/3 of present registered paid members?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:29 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:29 PM Please see responses to your separate post." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ET Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:41 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:41 PM You said the default quorum is majority of membership paid or not paid. What is Trina referring to when she said the default is 2/3? Does this 2/3 default apply only if there are amendments to the constitution for ratification?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chris H Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:48 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:48 PM I don't see where a quorum has been mentioned in this thread (until you brought it up). Besides comparing a quorum and voting requirement are apples and oranges." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ET Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:53 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 at 02:53 PM Sorry. My mistake." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.