Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 26, 2010 at 07:20 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2010 at 07:20 PM The minutes should record only what was DONE (e.g. motions), not what was SAID (e.g debate and tirades). The president has nothing to do with accepting them or not. The secretary submits her draft at the next meeting and, after any corrections, t" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted March 27, 2010 at 02:30 AM Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 at 02:30 AM jlynn, >>Can the minutes of a meeting be published if they are not accepted by the president?<< kg: Presidents are not relevant. Whether a president approves, or whether a president disapproves, makes no difference. A pre" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted March 27, 2010 at 05:22 AM Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 at 05:22 AM The point here, I think, is that the minutes should not, no way, include this after-the-fact tirade. Sure the president objected, EVERYBODY should object. Come to think of it, be sure the at-the-meeting tirade itself is not mentioned in " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted March 27, 2010 at 11:05 AM Report Share Posted March 27, 2010 at 11:05 AM > ...a long statement was included by a board member that was written AFTER the board meeting to summarize one of his "grandstanding tirades". The secretary included it in the corrections and the president has objected. < Did all " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.