Guest JDStackpole Posted March 27, 2010 at 02:36 AM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 02:36 AM If the item didn't REQUIRE previous notice, then its defeat was proper. The enemies of the "expected motion" acted in a somewhat unscrupulous manner in my view, but that is also called politics or "get the troops out". <"
Guest J. J. Posted March 27, 2010 at 03:51 AM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 03:51 AM And nothing would have prevented the friends of the motion from rallying the troops. J. J."
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 27, 2010 at 09:31 AM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 09:31 AM The agenda is adopted at the beginning of the meeting (see FAQ #14). Whatever these board members brought with them was just a proposal, not the agenda itself. Additionally, since this was, presumably, the annual meeting of the general membership"
Guest Trina Posted March 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 10:37 AM > Should not all the members be given the same information concerning the agenda? < Yes, it seems unfair. However, as has been repeatedly said, it was not improper according to RONR, assuming the motion itself did not require previous notic"
Guest JCB Posted March 27, 2010 at 02:51 PM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 02:51 PM Our bylaws state "The notice of the annual or any special meeting shall state the nature of the business to be transacted." Should not the members be notified that there was going to be a vote on the special assessment? This is an important issu"
Guest J. J. Posted March 27, 2010 at 03:13 PM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 03:13 PM JDS said, correctly, "If the item didn't REQUIRE previous notice, then its defeat was proper." I think you are now raising the possibility that the bylaws DID require notice. The question is now if the notice did provide for th"
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 27, 2010 at 03:20 PM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 03:20 PM >>Our bylaws state "The notice of the annual or any special meeting shall state the nature of the business to be transacted."<< Well, they're your bylaws. But the annual meeting is a regular meeting and, as far as R"
Guest Trina Posted March 27, 2010 at 03:33 PM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 03:33 PM > "The notice of the annual or any special meeting shall state the nature of the business to be transacted." < It certainly sounds as though your bylaws are specifically putting a notice requirement on the annual meeting (thereby "
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 27, 2010 at 05:18 PM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 05:18 PM Agreeing with the previous replies (to some extent)... Your bylaws phrase "the nature of the business to be transacted." is pretty nebulous and subject to a LOT of interpretation. Is the "nature" like committee report"
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 27, 2010 at 05:24 PM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 05:24 PM >>But your rules vary (and they're not particularly well-written) so you're on your own.<<"
Guest Trina Posted March 27, 2010 at 06:30 PM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 06:30 PM I'm wondering, given that the bylaws do require notice (albeit vaguely defined) of 'the nature of the business to be transacted', whether some obligation may follow that IF notice is sent, THEN perhaps all members have to receive the same notice? If there"
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 27, 2010 at 11:18 PM Report Posted March 27, 2010 at 11:18 PM Right! 100% of members must be sent ANY required notice. Otherwise rights of absentees are violated - p. 244 (e)."
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.