Guest JDStackpole Posted March 28, 2010 at 09:30 PM Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 at 09:30 PM The bylaws themselves should answer that question." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 28, 2010 at 09:37 PM Report Share Posted March 28, 2010 at 09:37 PM >>out house of delegates<< One hesitates to ask, and yet . . ." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DOUG Mader Posted March 29, 2010 at 12:07 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 12:07 AM someone said that thr rro stated that if the matfion is being aware prior to the meeting then it should be ther majoirty of the vote if is not aware of this motion then it need to vote by 2/3 " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 29, 2010 at 12:17 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 12:17 AM That all depends on a lot of variables. What, exactly, are you voting on, and what do your bylaws say about amending the bylaws." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DOUG Mader Posted March 29, 2010 at 12:21 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 12:21 AM change region name that is already in bylaws and in our bylaws it doesnt say vote by majority or 2/3 i guess we do this by rro guidelines " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 29, 2010 at 12:49 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 12:49 AM Which you will find on p. 562." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DOUG Mader Posted March 29, 2010 at 01:47 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 01:47 AM why dont you sit out and let someone else reply i want answers not run around trivia " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DOUG Mader Posted March 29, 2010 at 01:50 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 01:50 AM for your info we have that book now and 4 of us are argueing what the book interpret so it is 2vs 2 and we decided to come to this web site and seek answer " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 29, 2010 at 04:22 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 04:22 AM As you wish. I had no idea my replies blocked others from answering your questions." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:19 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:19 AM doug mader, Do you have a question about Robert's Rules of Order? We do not interpret bylaws or constitutions which contain wordings different from RONR 10th edition 2000. (You'd need a DICTIONARY, a book of ENGLISH GRAMMAR, and a textboo" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:43 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:43 AM DOUG, what about p. 562, which Dr. Stackpole quite reasonable referred you to, was not clear?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:49 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 05:49 AM Don't be offended, John, DOUG has read over seventy-seven thousand threads today, and he's beat." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted March 29, 2010 at 10:36 AM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 10:36 AM > for your info we have that book now and 4 of us are argueing what the book interpret so it is 2vs 2 and we decided to come to this web site and seek answer < What are the two sides/opinions in your 2 vs. 2 argument? Probably a misundersta" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.