Guest dan Posted March 29, 2010 at 10:10 PM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 10:10 PM "Majority of a quorum" doesn't mae sense. Check the bylaws, but the most commonrequirement is a majority of those present and voting." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Paul McClintock Posted March 29, 2010 at 10:14 PM Report Share Posted March 29, 2010 at 10:14 PM Per RONR, a candidate would need a majority of those voting at a meeting with a quorum present." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sandi Brusseau Posted March 30, 2010 at 11:37 PM Report Share Posted March 30, 2010 at 11:37 PM Thank you, now the second part- once nominations are closed and ballots distributed, are write ins allowed ? and how is an illegal vote counted ( a vote for a ficticious character) and how is a "no vote counted. need help" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N Posted March 31, 2010 at 02:21 AM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 02:21 AM Write-ins are allowed. Illegal votes add to the total -- making it harder for a legitimate candidate to achieve a majority. As to "no" votes, see Official Interpretation #2006-5, "BALLOT ELECTIONS: VOTING "NO" OR" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sandi Brusseau Posted March 31, 2010 at 02:45 PM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 02:45 PM There are those claiming that because there was only one candidate running, he should have won by acclaimation. My interpretation was that he COULD have been elected by acclamation, but it was not a MUST. We chose to have balloting, was this illegal as s" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted March 31, 2010 at 02:59 PM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 02:59 PM No, they're claim isn't based on anything in RONR." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest J. J. Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:54 PM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:54 PM The fictional character would be treated as an illegal vote by a legal voter (p. 402) but used to determine the majority. The assembly would make the determination of a "no" vote. I would note that "Dr. No" is a fictional cha" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:56 PM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:56 PM And so is "No One" - cf Homer." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.