Guest Robert B. Fish Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:29 PM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:29 PM There are no such definitions in RONR. -Bob" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chris H Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:31 PM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:31 PM RONR deals with parliamentary procedure not what clothes should be worn. However, I suppose that not wearing any clothes would probably disturb the assembly. :-)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dan Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:37 PM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 03:37 PM "However, I suppose that not wearing any clothes would probably disturb the assembly. :-) " Unless it was a meeting of a nudist organization, where the wearing of clothes might be consudered out of order." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 31, 2010 at 04:07 PM Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 at 04:07 PM >>what the body should be wearing?<< I suppose it depends on the body." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 1, 2010 at 01:06 AM Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 at 01:06 AM >>I was wondering if anything in Robert's Rules defined business casual or states what the body should be wearing?<< Nope. That's entirely up to the rules and customs of the organization. What is appropriate in a student gove" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 1, 2010 at 10:29 AM Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 at 10:29 AM And even what's considered "business casual" can vary from business to business. Casual Fridays may look very different at a Manhattan law firm (no ties?) vs. a California design agency (no shoes?)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.