Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 1, 2010 at 02:29 PM Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 at 02:29 PM >>If this was done incorrectly, what should have transpired?<< You should have followed your rules (and not given any special treatment to incumbents) but it's too late now to object. What the source of those pre-printed name" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted April 1, 2010 at 02:30 PM Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 at 02:30 PM Well, I suppose that you could argue that the act of passing out the pre-printed ballots was a form of "nomination" of those candidates. A tad irregular, per p. 418. You can only nominate one person at a time for board positions, altho" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Laura S Posted April 1, 2010 at 07:54 PM Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 at 07:54 PM No, those names were written in by the incumbents" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted April 1, 2010 at 08:02 PM Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 at 08:02 PM Since nominating and voting occur in the same meeting (right?), blank slips of paper should be used for ballots." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.