Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 2, 2010 at 08:41 PM Report Share Posted April 2, 2010 at 08:41 PM A member is free to waive the secrecy of his ballot and let others know how he voted. But make sure no one led members to believe that they had to initial their ballots in order for them to be counted." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Mary Posted April 3, 2010 at 12:29 AM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 12:29 AM well what we seem to think is that it was done so that certain people can identify who is for him and who is against him...by seeing the initials of who voted a certain way." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted April 3, 2010 at 05:49 AM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 05:49 AM The question is whether the voters wrote their initials voluntarily, or whether they were, or felt, coerced." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted April 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM I don't think coerced counts." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 3, 2010 at 07:42 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 07:42 PM >>well what we seem to think is that it was done so that certain people can identify who is for him and who is against him...by seeing the initials of who voted a certain way.<< If people voluntarily choose to mark their ballots they " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted April 3, 2010 at 07:47 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 07:47 PM And whether they initial it, write their whole name, or hand it over saying aloud "I vote yes" does not invalidate it either, correct? (as long as it's voluntary?) " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 3, 2010 at 08:24 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 08:24 PM >>And whether they initial it, write their whole name, or hand it over saying aloud "I vote yes" does not invalidate it either, correct?<< Indeed. The rule in RONR is that the assembly may not adopt any motion which forces a" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted April 29, 2010 at 03:23 PM Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 at 03:23 PM "The rule in RONR is that the assembly may not adopt any motion which forces a member to disclose his vote." Can someone please cite where in RONR this is stated? " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted April 29, 2010 at 03:26 PM Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 at 03:26 PM RONR, p. 244 (e) and p. 255." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted April 29, 2010 at 03:31 PM Report Share Posted April 29, 2010 at 03:31 PM I think I would cite p. 399, ll. 3-11." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.