Guest Rob Elsman Posted April 3, 2010 at 05:48 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 05:48 PM The committee should make its report at the next meeting, as scheduled, and go out of business like it's supposed to." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted April 3, 2010 at 08:17 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 08:17 PM >>Since this info was provided in closed door session and was provided under the terms that we do not divulge it, what do we do?<< Make nominations. If you're asking about who to nominate or what to say about the nominations," Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted April 3, 2010 at 08:32 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 08:32 PM H, >>Our next meeting is the election so we cannot remove him from office.<< kg: Do you mean, his office will NOT be an office which is up for election at your next meeting? Do you WANT to remove your president? There are" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 3, 2010 at 08:38 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 08:38 PM >>Do you mean, his office will NOT be an office which is up for election at your next meeting?<< That would make little sense. It seems more likely that, since his term is up soon, there's no time to remove him from office." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:29 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:29 PM I think we are being more political than we should. Based on our by-laws, the incumbent qualifies to run. Any other knowledge of mishandlings is a board/membership problem, not the nominating committee's problem. Is that what you all saying?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:33 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:33 PM the office is up for re-election each year(one year minimum of two consecutive terms in the same office). He wants to run again. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:38 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:38 PM Pretty much. Though it's not at all clear that the members of the nominating committee are prohibited from disclosing the president's misdeeds. But there's more than one way to skin cat. If you think he's lost important documents, ask him to prod" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:40 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:40 PM Please insert an "a" between the "skin" and the "cat". A subcutaneous "a", if you will." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:55 PM Report Share Posted April 3, 2010 at 09:55 PM very punny! I can't thank you enough for your insight." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.