Guest Robert B. Fish Posted April 5, 2010 at 05:57 PM Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 at 05:57 PM It seems the proposed amendment has been poorly drafted. (The bylaws committee should have dealt with this problem.) You should not adopt an amendment to your bylaws that would leave two sections conflicting with each other. You have several op" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 5, 2010 at 06:07 PM Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 at 06:07 PM <<what would be our next step?<< Fire the people that came up with that crappy amendment. Then defeat it. At the very least, change "less" to "fewer". And write "nine" instead of "9". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sylvia Posted April 5, 2010 at 06:12 PM Report Share Posted April 5, 2010 at 06:12 PM Thank you Bob...this really helps. I will pass on the information to our President. The reason we want to amend this By-law is to be able to run with a minimum of 4 directors but no more than 9 as we are often scrambling to get enough Members to run for" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grey Posted April 14, 2010 at 03:59 PM Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 at 03:59 PM The proposed amendment should be written so that it amends any and all areas of the bylaws that are affected by the issue. If there's not time to do that before the AGM, then you need to prepare a second amendment that can be proposed from the floor at t" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.