Guest Thomas Ralph Posted April 6, 2010 at 08:32 AM Report Posted April 6, 2010 at 08:32 AM It might be relevant where draft copies of the minutes were sent out, to put members who might not have attended the meeting on notice that the draft copy should not be relied upon."
Guest Dan Honemann Posted April 6, 2010 at 09:13 AM Report Posted April 6, 2010 at 09:13 AM As noted in RONR (10th ed., p. 452-453), minutes are to include "the wording in which each motion was adopted or otherwise disposed of (with the facts as to whether the motion may have been debated or amended before disposition being mentioned only p"
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted April 6, 2010 at 09:14 AM Report Posted April 6, 2010 at 09:14 AM And it conforms to the rule that the minutes record what was done at the meeting. Corrections were "done" so that fact is recorded. Just as it might be recorded that Mr. Mitchell gave a talk (without recording the text of the talk). Tho"
David A Foulkes Posted April 6, 2010 at 02:29 PM Report Posted April 6, 2010 at 02:29 PM Trina: In these days of word processors, the original erroneous text leaves no trace (as opposed to the days when minutes were handwritten, or typed). Gee, you mean we're doing it the old way? Don't let our Secretary know! "
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.