Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 8, 2010 at 03:40 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 03:40 PM See FAQ #20, elsewhere on this site." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted May 8, 2010 at 03:45 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 03:45 PM See RONR (10th ed.), pp. 556, 567, 642, 643." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Michael Sohns Posted May 8, 2010 at 04:20 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 04:20 PM I don't mean to be disrepectful, but I was hoping for a more specific answer than yet another "see FAQ #20." It's from reading FAQ #20 and the referred pages that I understand about "and" versus "or" in the length of term of " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted May 8, 2010 at 04:23 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 04:23 PM Oops! 567 should read 557. I can't wait for that edit button! :)" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted May 8, 2010 at 04:37 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 04:37 PM I don't understand much of this post, but it seems to me that, as a matter of the general parliamentary law, the term of office ends with the final adjournment of the session at which the officer is elected, when the bylaws are silent about the term of of" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted May 8, 2010 at 04:42 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 04:42 PM >>What about any thoughts on forcing through some ByLaw changes to address that lack?<< Amending the bylaws is always an option but I don't know what you mean by "forcing through" an amendment. And it's unlikely that the boa" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted May 8, 2010 at 05:19 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 05:19 PM MS, >>What, if any, are our options when we don't even have a statement about length of term of office? What about any thoughts on forcing through some ByLaw changes to address that lack?<< kg: Oh! You aren't asking a question" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Michael Sohns Posted May 8, 2010 at 06:48 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 06:48 PM Appreciate the answers. Thanks much." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted May 8, 2010 at 08:32 PM Report Share Posted May 8, 2010 at 08:32 PM > I'm thinking that the remaining Board members can force through a few Bylaw changes (that would take effect immediately; our Bylaws allow for the Board to make amendments without involving the general membership) that would address the missing length" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted May 9, 2010 at 11:47 PM Report Share Posted May 9, 2010 at 11:47 PM >>What, if any, are our options when we don't even have a statement about length of term of office?<< It seems to me your options are to have the general membership conduct a recall, as provided for in your Bylaws, or to have the gene" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.