Guest J. J. Posted May 11, 2010 at 02:41 AM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 02:41 AM What rules do you claim "were not adhered to?" The absence of the president has no bearing on the legitimacy of the meeting. J. J." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Donna Kenly Posted May 11, 2010 at 02:47 AM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 02:47 AM The meeting was not called to order,no was appointed to run the meeting, motions were passed by the membership that dictate business to the BOD." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest J. J. Posted May 11, 2010 at 02:56 AM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 02:56 AM >>The meeting was not called to order,<< Since the group obviously was aware that the meeting was beginning (and in order), it is too late to raise a point of order (p. 244). >>no was appointed to run the meeting,<&l" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted May 11, 2010 at 02:57 AM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 02:57 AM Donna Kenly, >>The meeting was not called to order, no was appointed to run the meeting, motions were passed by the membership that dictate business to the BOD.<< kg: And you think that the above makes the adoptions of each motion" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Donna Kenly Posted May 11, 2010 at 03:12 AM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 03:12 AM It got by the membership because most if not all... are unconscious when it comes to RR. I doubt there was even a copy of RR at the meeting." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest J. J. Posted May 11, 2010 at 03:36 AM Report Share Posted May 11, 2010 at 03:36 AM That has nothing to do with it. The point is that assembly acquiesced to the procedure. It is too late now to do anything about that. J. J. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.